ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

元人种学×扎根理论×
领域科学计量学质性研究
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19881967
提出者George W. Noblit and R. Dwight HareBarney Glaser and Anselm Strauss
类型Qualitative evidence synthesis methodMethod
开创性文献Noblit, G. W., & Hare, R. D. (1988). Meta-ethnography: Synthesizing qualitative studies. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803930780Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine. link ↗
别名qualitative meta-synthesis, interpretive synthesis, ethnographic synthesis, meta-ethnographic reviewGT, Grounded Theory Approach
相关43
摘要Meta-ethnography is a systematic method for synthesising findings across multiple qualitative studies by comparing and translating the conceptual frameworks and metaphors each study uses. Developed by Noblit and Hare in 1988, it produces a new interpretive account that goes beyond any single study, preserving the richness of qualitative data while generating broader theoretical insights. It is the most influential approach to qualitative evidence synthesis in health, social, and educational research.Grounded Theory (GT) is a systematic qualitative research methodology in which theory emerges directly from data through iterative analysis, rather than being imposed before data collection. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, GT prioritizes generating explanatory frameworks grounded in evidence.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Meta-ethnography · Grounded Theory. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare