ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

荟萃分析随机对照试验×个体患者数据荟萃分析×
领域流行病学证据综合
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1976 (Glass coinage of meta-analysis); 1993 (Cochrane Collaboration formalization)1990s
提出者Gene V. Glass (meta-analysis method); Cochrane Collaboration (systematic RCT pooling standards)Cochrane Collaboration, Pioneered by Stewart & Clarke
类型Quantitative evidence-synthesis designMethod
开创性文献Higgins, J. P. T., Thomas, J., Chandler, J., Cumpston, M., Li, T., Page, M. J., & Welch, V. A. (Eds.). (2019). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN: 978-1119536628Stewart, L. A., Clarke, M. J., & Cochrane IPD Meta-analysis Methods Group. (2015). Practical methodology of meta-analyses (including IPD) of randomised trials reporting time to event data. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2015(10), MR000027. link ↗
别名meta-analytic RCT, MA-RCT, meta-analysis of RCTs, pooled randomized trial analysisIPD Meta-Analysis, Participant-Level Data Synthesis, One-Stage Meta-Analysis
相关31
摘要A meta-analytic randomized clinical trial is a formal evidence-synthesis method that identifies, appraises, and statistically combines the results of multiple randomized clinical trials addressing the same clinical question. By pooling trial-level data, it produces a single, more precise estimate of treatment effect and quantifies between-trial heterogeneity, sitting at the apex of the evidence hierarchy for evaluating healthcare interventions.Individual patient data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) is a systematic synthesis method where researchers obtain and analyze raw data at the patient level from multiple randomized controlled trials, rather than relying on published summary statistics (aggregate data). Pioneered by the Cochrane Collaboration and formalized by Stewart, Clarke, and Riley, IPD-MA is considered the gold standard for evidence synthesis because it enables consistent outcome definition across trials, robust subgroup analysis, and detection of treatment-covariate interactions. Though time-intensive and resource-demanding, IPD-MA provides the most reliable estimates of intervention effects and is preferred for critical clinical decisions, particularly for identifying which patients benefit most from treatment.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Meta-analytic Randomized Clinical Trial · Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare