ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

荟萃分析诊断准确性研究×诊断准确性研究设计×
领域流行病学临床研究
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1993–2005 (foundational models)2003-2015
提出者Moses, Shapiro & Littenberg (SROC framework, 1993); Reitsma et al. (bivariate model, 2005)Bossuyt, Reitsma, and STARD group (2003); clinical epidemiology pioneers
类型Quantitative systematic synthesisResearch Design
开创性文献Reitsma, J. B., Glas, A. S., Rutjes, A. W., Scholten, R. J., Bossuyt, P. M., & Zwinderman, A. H. (2005). Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 58(10), 982–990. DOI ↗Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L. M., ... & de Vet, H. C. (2003). Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Annals of Internal Medicine, 138(1), 40–44. DOI ↗
别名DTA meta-analysis, diagnostic meta-analysis, systematic review of diagnostic accuracy, pooled diagnostic accuracydiagnostic accuracy study, test accuracy, STARD, diagnostic evaluation
相关22
摘要A meta-analytic diagnostic accuracy study systematically identifies and pools sensitivity and specificity data from multiple primary diagnostic test accuracy studies. Using the bivariate or hierarchical summary ROC (HSROC) model, it produces a joint summary of a test's ability to correctly classify diseased and non-diseased individuals across diverse clinical settings, accounting for the inherent trade-off between sensitivity and specificity.A diagnostic accuracy study evaluates how well a new diagnostic test (or biomarker, imaging modality, clinical assessment) detects the presence or absence of disease compared to a reference standard (gold standard). Standardized since 2003 by the STARD (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) initiative, diagnostic accuracy studies are fundamental to clinical medicine, determining whether and how new tests can improve patient diagnosis and treatment.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Meta-analytic Diagnostic Accuracy Study · Diagnostic Accuracy Study Design. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare