ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

荟萃分析病例对照研究×前瞻性病例对照研究×
领域流行病学流行病学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1980s–2000 (formalized with MOOSE reporting guidelines in 2000)1970s–1990s (formalized alongside nested case-control methods)
提出者Systematic development attributed to multiple epidemiologists; MOOSE guidelines formalized by Stroup et al.Evolved from classical retrospective case-control methodology; prospective embedding attributed to modern epidemiological practice (Rothman, Greenland, and others, late 20th century)
类型Observational study synthesisObservational analytic study design
开创性文献Shapiro, S. (1994). Meta-analysis/Shmeta-analysis. American Journal of Epidemiology, 140(9), 771-778. DOI ↗Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641
别名pooled case-control analysis, case-control meta-analysis, meta-analytic case-control design, systematic pooled case-controlprospective case-control design, ambidirectional case-control, bidirectional case-control, nested case-control (prospective variant)
相关46
摘要A meta-analytic case-control study systematically identifies, critically appraises, and quantitatively synthesizes data from multiple independent case-control studies examining the same exposure-disease relationship. By pooling odds ratios across studies, it yields a more precise and generalizable estimate of association than any single study can provide, while formally quantifying heterogeneity across populations, settings, and study periods.A prospective case-control study embeds the case-control logic within a defined cohort followed forward in time. Cases are identified as they occur, rather than looked up in records after the fact, and controls are sampled from the same prospectively monitored base population. This forward-looking approach allows collection of exposure data before outcome ascertainment, reducing recall bias — the principal weakness of the classic retrospective case-control design — while retaining the efficiency gains of sampling controls rather than enrolling a full cohort.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Meta-analytic case-control study · Prospective Case-Control Study. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare