ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Gain-Loss Message Framing Analysis×Framing Analysis×
领域CommunicationCommunication
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19971993
提出者Rothman & Salovey (health framing synthesis); roots in Kahneman & TverskyRobert M. Entman (synthesis); roots in Goffman, Tuchman, Gitlin
类型Experiment comparing gain- versus loss-framed persuasive messagesInterpretive-quantitative analysis of how messages select and emphasize aspects of reality
开创性文献Rothman, A. J., & Salovey, P. (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 3–19. DOI ↗Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. DOI ↗
别名Message framing analysis, Gain-loss framing study, Valence framing experiment, Kazanç-Kayıp Mesaj Çerçeveleme AnaliziFrame analysis, Media framing analysis method, Frame mapping, Çerçeveleme Analizi
相关45
摘要Gain-loss message framing analysis is an experimental method for testing whether a persuasive appeal works better when it stresses the benefits of acting (gain frame) or the costs of not acting (loss frame). Grounded in prospect theory and synthesized for health communication by Rothman and Salovey, it predicts that loss frames are more persuasive for risky detection behaviors while gain frames win for safe prevention behaviors.Framing analysis is a communication research method for studying how messages select certain aspects of a perceived reality and make them more salient — promoting a particular problem definition, causal interpretation, moral evaluation, and treatment recommendation. Building on Robert Entman's influential 1993 synthesis, it moves beyond counting what is present to reconstructing the organizing ideas, or frames, that give media coverage its meaning and persuasive shape.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Gain-Loss Message Framing Analysis · Framing Analysis. 于 2026-06-24 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare