ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

孟德尔随机化×回归断点设计 (Regression Discontinuity Design, RDD)×
领域因果推断因果推断
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份19972008
提出者George Davey SmithImbens & Lemieux (guide to practice); Cattaneo, Idrobo & Titiunik (practical introduction)
类型Genetic instrumental variable frameworkQuasi-experimental causal design
开创性文献Davey Smith, G., & Hemani, G. (2014). Mendelian randomization: genetic anchors for causal inference in epidemiological studies. Human Molecular Genetics, 23(R1), R89-R98. DOI ↗Imbens, G. W., & Lemieux, T. (2008). Regression Discontinuity Designs: A Guide to Practice. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 615-635. DOI ↗
别名MRRDD, regression discontinuity design, sharp RDD, fuzzy RDD
相关25
摘要Mendelian randomization is a method for estimating causal effects of exposures on outcomes using genetic variants as instrumental variables. Introduced by George Davey Smith in the 1990s, it exploits Mendel's law of segregation to remove confounding bias. It has become a cornerstone technique in epidemiological causal inference.Regression Discontinuity Design is a quasi-experimental method that identifies a causal effect by locally comparing units just above and just below a cutoff on a continuous assignment (running) variable. Formalised for applied work by Imbens and Lemieux (2008) and developed as a practical framework by Cattaneo, Idrobo, and Titiunik (2020), it estimates a local average treatment effect (LATE) at the threshold.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Mendelian Randomization · Regression Discontinuity. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare