方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 最大变异抽样× | 目的性抽样× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 调查方法论 | 调查方法论 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1985 (Lincoln & Guba); elaborated 1990–2002 (Patton) | Formalized ~1980–1990 |
| 提出者≠ | Lincoln & Guba; systematised by Michael Quinn Patton | Michael Quinn Patton (systematic articulation); roots in early qualitative inquiry |
| 类型≠ | Purposive qualitative sampling strategy | Non-probability sampling strategy |
| 开创性文献≠ | Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Sage. Chapter 5: Purposeful Sampling. ISBN: 978-0761919711 | Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-0803937796 |
| 别名 | maximum variation sampling, maximum diversity sampling, MVS, heterogeneous sampling | judgmental sampling, selective sampling, criterion-based sampling, purposeful sampling |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | Maximum variation sampling is a purposive qualitative sampling strategy in which the researcher deliberately selects cases that span the widest possible range of variation on dimensions central to the study. The goal is not statistical representation but the identification of common patterns that cut across diverse cases as well as the documentation of the unique ways each context shapes the phenomenon under investigation. | Purposive sampling is a non-probability strategy in which the researcher deliberately selects participants, documents, or cases that are information-rich with respect to the research question. Rather than drawing units at random, the researcher applies explicit criteria aligned with the study's purpose, maximising the depth and relevance of the data collected. It is the default sampling logic in most qualitative research designs and is also used in mixed-methods and applied evaluative work. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|