方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 匹配方法（CEM / 最优 / 遗传）× | 对隐藏偏差的敏感性分析（Rosenbaum 界 / E 值）× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 因果推断 | 因果推断 |
| 方法族 | Regression model | Regression model |
| 起源年份≠ | 2012 | 2002 |
| 提出者≠ | Iacus, King & Porro (CEM); Hansen (optimal/full matching) | Paul R. Rosenbaum (bounds); Tyler J. VanderWeele & Peng Ding (E-value) |
| 类型≠ | Matching for causal inference | Sensitivity analysis for causal inference |
| 开创性文献≠ | Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗ | Rosenbaum, P. R. (2002). Observational Studies (2nd ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-0387989679 |
| 别名 | coarsened exact matching, optimal matching, genetic matching, CEM | Rosenbaum bounds, E-value, hidden bias sensitivity analysis, unmeasured confounding sensitivity |
| 相关 | 5 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | Matching Methods are a family of causal-inference techniques beyond propensity-score matching that pair treated and control units with similar covariates so that a treatment effect can be read off the balanced sample. The family includes Coarsened Exact Matching (Iacus, King & Porro, 2012), optimal matching, and genetic matching. | Sensitivity analysis for hidden bias is a family of methods that quantify how strongly an unmeasured confounder would have to operate before it could overturn a causal conclusion drawn from observational data. It was crystallised by Paul Rosenbaum's sensitivity bounds (2002) and extended by VanderWeele and Ding's E-value (2017). |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|