方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 匹配方法（CEM / 最优 / 遗传）× | 倾向得分匹配× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 因果推断 | 研究统计学 |
| 方法族≠ | Regression model | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2012 | 1983 |
| 提出者≠ | Iacus, King & Porro (CEM); Hansen (optimal/full matching) | Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin |
| 类型≠ | Matching for causal inference | Method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗ | Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗ |
| 别名≠ | coarsened exact matching, optimal matching, genetic matching, CEM | PSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 3 |
| 摘要≠ | Matching Methods are a family of causal-inference techniques beyond propensity-score matching that pair treated and control units with similar covariates so that a treatment effect can be read off the balanced sample. The family includes Coarsened Exact Matching (Iacus, King & Porro, 2012), optimal matching, and genetic matching. | Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|