ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

匹配估计量×倾向得分加权法 (PSW / IPW)×
领域因果推断因果推断
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份19731983 (propensity score); 2003 (efficient IPW estimator)
提出者Rubin (1973); large-sample theory by Abadie & Imbens (2006)Rosenbaum & Rubin (propensity score); Hirano, Imbens & Ridder (efficient weighting)
类型Nonparametric matching / causal inferenceCausal inference / reweighting
开创性文献Abadie, A., & Imbens, G. W. (2006). Large Sample Properties of Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects. Econometrica, 74(1), 235-267. DOI ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. DOI ↗
别名nearest-neighbor matching, NNM, matching on covariates, covariate matchingPSW, inverse probability weighting, IPW, propensity-based weighting
相关66
摘要The matching estimator identifies the causal effect of a treatment by pairing each treated unit with one or more untreated units that have similar observed characteristics. Formalised by Rubin (1973) and given rigorous large-sample theory by Abadie and Imbens (2006), it constructs a credible control group from observational data without requiring a parametric model for the outcome.Propensity score weighting is a causal-inference method that reweights observations so that the covariate distributions of treated and untreated units look exchangeable, enabling unbiased estimation of average treatment effects from observational data. Each unit receives a weight that is the inverse of its probability of receiving the treatment it actually received — a strategy formalised by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983) and given its efficient semiparametric form by Hirano, Imbens and Ridder (2003).
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Matching Estimator · Propensity Score Weighting. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare