ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

匹配筛查试验评估×诊断准确性研究设计×
领域流行病学临床研究
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1980s–2000s (formalized alongside diagnostic accuracy methodology)2003-2015
提出者Methodological synthesis from matched case-control and diagnostic accuracy traditions (Pepe, Zhou, and others)Bossuyt, Reitsma, and STARD group (2003); clinical epidemiology pioneers
类型Observational diagnostic study with matched designResearch Design
开创性文献Pepe, M. S. (2003). The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0198509844Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L. M., ... & de Vet, H. C. (2003). Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Annals of Internal Medicine, 138(1), 40–44. DOI ↗
别名matched diagnostic accuracy study, paired screening evaluation, matched-pair test performance study, matched screening assessmentdiagnostic accuracy study, test accuracy, STARD, diagnostic evaluation
相关62
摘要Matched screening test evaluation assesses the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of a screening or diagnostic test using a matched design, in which disease-positive cases are paired with one or more disease-free controls selected to share key characteristics such as age, sex, or clinical setting. Matching controls for confounders before measuring test performance produces more precise and less biased estimates of diagnostic accuracy, and enables direct paired comparisons of competing tests within the same subjects.A diagnostic accuracy study evaluates how well a new diagnostic test (or biomarker, imaging modality, clinical assessment) detects the presence or absence of disease compared to a reference standard (gold standard). Standardized since 2003 by the STARD (Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies) initiative, diagnostic accuracy studies are fundamental to clinical medicine, determining whether and how new tests can improve patient diagnosis and treatment.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Matched Screening Test Evaluation · Diagnostic Accuracy Study Design. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare