ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

匹配的诊断准确性研究×横断面流行病学研究×
领域流行病学流行病学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1990s–2000s (formalised with STARD 2003)1960s (formal codification); widely practiced since mid-20th century
提出者Evolved from matched case-control methodology; STARD standards formalised by Bossuyt et al. (2003)Classical epidemiology tradition; systematized by Brian MacMahon and Thomas Pugh (1960s)
类型Diagnostic / clinical epidemiology study designObservational, descriptive/analytic epidemiological design
开创性文献Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L. M., Lijmer, J. G., Moher, D., Rennie, D., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2003). Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative. BMJ, 326(7379), 41–44. DOI ↗Kelsey, J. L., Whittemore, A. S., Evans, A. S., & Thompson, W. D. (1996). Methods in Observational Epidemiology (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. ISBN: 978-0195080407
别名matched DAS, paired diagnostic accuracy study, matched test accuracy study, matched sensitivity-specificity studyprevalence study, cross-sectional survey, transversal study, cross-sectional design
相关46
摘要A matched diagnostic accuracy study evaluates how well an index test correctly identifies a target condition in study participants who have been matched on key characteristics — such as age, sex, or disease severity — to control for confounding. By pairing diseased and non-diseased subjects on relevant factors before administering the test, the design isolates the test's own discriminative performance from variation attributable to imbalanced covariates, yielding cleaner estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and related accuracy measures.A cross-sectional epidemiological study measures the exposure(s) and outcome(s) of interest simultaneously in a defined population at a single point in time (or over a short period). Because there is no follow-up, it is the most efficient observational design for estimating disease prevalence and for generating hypotheses about associations between risk factors and health outcomes.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Matched Diagnostic Accuracy Study · Cross-sectional epidemiological study. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare