ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

匹配的诊断准确性研究×队列研究×
领域流行病学流行病学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1990s–2000s (formalised with STARD 2003)Mid-20th century (formal epidemiological design codified ~1950s)
提出者Evolved from matched case-control methodology; STARD standards formalised by Bossuyt et al. (2003)Doll & Hill (British Doctors Study, 1951); Snow (cholera, 1854)
类型Diagnostic / clinical epidemiology study designObservational longitudinal study design
开创性文献Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L. M., Lijmer, J. G., Moher, D., Rennie, D., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2003). Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: The STARD initiative. BMJ, 326(7379), 41–44. DOI ↗Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641
别名matched DAS, paired diagnostic accuracy study, matched test accuracy study, matched sensitivity-specificity studylongitudinal study, follow-up study, panel study, incidence study
相关46
摘要A matched diagnostic accuracy study evaluates how well an index test correctly identifies a target condition in study participants who have been matched on key characteristics — such as age, sex, or disease severity — to control for confounding. By pairing diseased and non-diseased subjects on relevant factors before administering the test, the design isolates the test's own discriminative performance from variation attributable to imbalanced covariates, yielding cleaner estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and related accuracy measures.A cohort study assembles a group of individuals who share a common starting point — typically freedom from the outcome of interest — and follows them over time to observe who develops the outcome. By comparing incidence rates between exposed and unexposed subgroups, researchers can estimate relative risk and absolute risk differences. Cohort studies are the gold-standard observational design for measuring disease incidence and establishing temporal relationships between exposure and outcome.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Matched Diagnostic Accuracy Study · Cohort Study. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare