ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

配对横断面流行病学研究×匹配队列研究×
领域流行病学流行病学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份Mid-to-late 20th century (formalized ~1970s–1990s)Mid-20th century; propensity-score variant 1983
提出者Developed within the tradition of observational epidemiology; matching principles codified by Greenland, Rothman, and Kelsey in modern epidemiology textsEstablished practice; propensity-score matching formalized by Rosenbaum & Rubin (1983)
类型Observational epidemiological study designObservational analytic study design
开创性文献Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641Rothman, K. J., Greenland, S., & Lash, T. L. (2008). Modern Epidemiology (3rd ed.). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN: 978-0781755641
别名matched cross-sectional survey, matched prevalence study, matched cross-sectional design, frequency-matched cross-sectional studymatched follow-up study, paired cohort study, propensity-matched cohort, matched prospective study
相关55
摘要A matched cross-sectional epidemiological study is an observational design that measures exposure and outcome simultaneously in a population sample while applying matching to control for one or more confounding variables. By pairing or grouping participants on key characteristics such as age, sex, or socioeconomic status before or during analysis, the design reduces confounding bias without requiring longitudinal follow-up, making it efficient for estimating prevalence and cross-sectional associations.A matched cohort study is an observational design in which each exposed participant is paired with one or more unexposed counterparts who share key characteristics — such as age, sex, or comorbidity status — before both groups are followed forward in time to compare incident outcomes. Matching controls for measured confounders at the design stage, reducing bias that would otherwise require statistical adjustment alone.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Matched Cross-Sectional Epidemiological Study · Matched Cohort Study. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare