ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Many-Facet Rasch Measurement×概化理论(G-Theory)×
领域Education心理测量学
方法族Latent structureLatent structure
起源年份19891963–1972
提出者John Michael LinacreLee J. Cronbach, Goldine Gleser, Harinder Nanda, Nageswari Rajaratnam
类型Rasch model extension adding rater and other facets to person and itemVariance-components reliability model
开创性文献Linacre, J. M. (1989). Many-Facet Rasch Measurement. MESA Press. ISBN: 9780941938020Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C., Nanda, H. & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles. Wiley. link ↗
别名MFRM, Many-Faceted Rasch Model, Facets Model, Linacre Facets ModelG-theory, G-study / D-study framework, variance components reliability
相关44
摘要Many-facet Rasch measurement (MFRM) extends the basic Rasch model to assessments mediated by raters. Beyond examinee ability and item difficulty, it adds explicit parameters for rater severity and for any other facet of the rating situation — task, occasion, rating criterion — placing them all on one common logit scale. Developed by John Michael Linacre, MFRM lets analysts estimate and adjust for the fact that some raters are systematically harsh and others lenient, producing 'fair' ability estimates that do not penalize an examinee for happening to draw a severe judge.Generalizability Theory is a psychometric framework that decomposes observed score variance into multiple sources — persons, items, raters, occasions, and their interactions — using analysis of variance. It replaces the single reliability coefficient of classical test theory with a family of coefficients that tell researchers how well scores generalize across different measurement conditions.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Many-Facet Rasch Measurement · Generalizability Theory. 于 2026-06-25 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare