ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

机器学习增强的断点回归设计×倾向得分匹配×
领域因果推断研究统计学
方法族Regression modelProcess / pipeline
起源年份20191983
提出者Imbens & Wager (2019); Calonico, Cattaneo & Farrell (2019)Paul Rosenbaum and Donald Rubin
类型Causal inference / quasi-experimentalMethod
开创性文献Calonico, S., Cattaneo, M. D., & Farrell, M. H. (2019). Optimal mean squared error bandwidth selection for regression discontinuity designs. Bernoulli, 25(4A), 2703-2729. link ↗Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. DOI ↗
别名ML-RDD, ML-augmented RD, data-adaptive RDD, nonparametric RDD with MLPSM, propensity score weighting, covariate balance
相关33
摘要Machine learning-augmented regression discontinuity design (ML-RDD) combines the sharp identification logic of classical RDD — exploiting a known assignment cutoff in a running variable — with flexible, data-adaptive ML methods for bandwidth selection, conditional mean estimation, and covariate adjustment. The goal is to recover a more accurate and less assumption-laden estimate of the local average treatment effect at the threshold.Propensity score matching (PSM) is a method for reducing confounding bias in observational studies by balancing baseline characteristics between treatment groups, simulating randomization. Developed by Rosenbaum and Rubin (1983), it estimates the probability of receiving treatment given observed covariates, then matches or weights treated and control individuals with similar treatment probabilities. Widely used in medicine, epidemiology, and policy evaluation when randomized trials are infeasible or unethical, enabling estimation of treatment effects while controlling for selection bias.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Machine learning-augmented regression discontinuity design · Propensity Score Matching. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare