ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

机器学习增强倾向得分匹配×双重稳健估计(AIPW)×
领域因果推断因果推断
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份20042005
提出者McCaffrey, Ridgeway & Morral (2004); Westreich, Lessler & Funk (2010)Robins & Rotnitzky; Bang & Robins
类型Causal inference / matchingSemiparametric causal estimator
开创性文献McCaffrey, D. F., Ridgeway, G., & Morral, A. R. (2004). Propensity score estimation with boosted regression for evaluating causal effects in observational studies. Psychological Methods, 9(4), 403-425. DOI ↗Robins, J. M. & Rotnitzky, A. (1995). Semiparametric Efficiency in Multivariate Regression Models with Missing Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90(429), 122-129. DOI ↗
别名ML-PSM, boosted propensity score matching, ML-augmented PSM, nonparametric propensity score matchingAIPW, augmented inverse probability weighting, doubly robust estimator, Çift Gürbüz Kestirici (Augmented IPW / AIPW)
相关65
摘要Machine learning-augmented propensity score matching (ML-PSM) replaces the traditional logistic regression used to estimate propensity scores with flexible machine learning algorithms — such as gradient boosted trees, random forests, or LASSO — to better capture complex, nonlinear relationships among covariates. The resulting richer propensity scores improve covariate balance and reduce bias in the estimated average treatment effect on the treated (ATT).Doubly Robust Estimation, also called Augmented Inverse Probability Weighting (AIPW), is a semiparametric method for estimating causal treatment effects that combines an outcome regression model with a propensity (treatment) model. Developed in the work of Robins & Rotnitzky (1995) and Bang & Robins (2005), it stays consistent as long as at least one of the two models is correctly specified.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Machine Learning-Augmented Propensity Score Matching · Doubly Robust Estimation. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare