ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

机器学习增强倾向得分匹配×粗化精确匹配 (CEM)×
领域因果推断因果推断
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份20042011-2012
提出者McCaffrey, Ridgeway & Morral (2004); Westreich, Lessler & Funk (2010)Iacus, King, & Porro
类型Causal inference / matchingMatching / causal inference
开创性文献McCaffrey, D. F., Ridgeway, G., & Morral, A. R. (2004). Propensity score estimation with boosted regression for evaluating causal effects in observational studies. Psychological Methods, 9(4), 403-425. DOI ↗Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗
别名ML-PSM, boosted propensity score matching, ML-augmented PSM, nonparametric propensity score matchingCEM, coarsened matching, monotonic imbalance bounding matching
相关66
摘要Machine learning-augmented propensity score matching (ML-PSM) replaces the traditional logistic regression used to estimate propensity scores with flexible machine learning algorithms — such as gradient boosted trees, random forests, or LASSO — to better capture complex, nonlinear relationships among covariates. The resulting richer propensity scores improve covariate balance and reduce bias in the estimated average treatment effect on the treated (ATT).Coarsened Exact Matching is a preprocessing method that achieves covariate balance by temporarily coarsening continuous variables into bins, exactly matching treated and control units within those bins, and then discarding all unmatched units. Introduced by Iacus, King, and Porro (2011, 2012), it bounds imbalance on each covariate independently, yielding a matched sample on which any estimator can be applied without relying on a propensity score model.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Machine Learning-Augmented Propensity Score Matching · Coarsened Exact Matching. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare