方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 机器学习增强倾向得分匹配× | 粗化精确匹配 (CEM)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 因果推断 | 因果推断 |
| 方法族 | Regression model | Regression model |
| 起源年份≠ | 2004 | 2011-2012 |
| 提出者≠ | McCaffrey, Ridgeway & Morral (2004); Westreich, Lessler & Funk (2010) | Iacus, King, & Porro |
| 类型≠ | Causal inference / matching | Matching / causal inference |
| 开创性文献≠ | McCaffrey, D. F., Ridgeway, G., & Morral, A. R. (2004). Propensity score estimation with boosted regression for evaluating causal effects in observational studies. Psychological Methods, 9(4), 403-425. DOI ↗ | Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗ |
| 别名≠ | ML-PSM, boosted propensity score matching, ML-augmented PSM, nonparametric propensity score matching | CEM, coarsened matching, monotonic imbalance bounding matching |
| 相关 | 6 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Machine learning-augmented propensity score matching (ML-PSM) replaces the traditional logistic regression used to estimate propensity scores with flexible machine learning algorithms — such as gradient boosted trees, random forests, or LASSO — to better capture complex, nonlinear relationships among covariates. The resulting richer propensity scores improve covariate balance and reduce bias in the estimated average treatment effect on the treated (ATT). | Coarsened Exact Matching is a preprocessing method that achieves covariate balance by temporarily coarsening continuous variables into bins, exactly matching treated and control units within those bins, and then discarding all unmatched units. Introduced by Iacus, King, and Porro (2011, 2012), it bounds imbalance on each covariate independently, yielding a matched sample on which any estimator can be applied without relying on a propensity score model. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|