ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

机器学习增强双重稳健估计 (ML-DR)×双重差分法 (Diff-in-Diff)×
领域因果推断计量经济学
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份20181994
提出者Chernozhukov, Chetverikov, Demirer, Duflo, Hansen, Newey & RobinsCard & Krueger (canonical 1994 application); Angrist & Pischke (textbook treatment)
类型Semiparametric causal estimator with ML nuisanceCausal inference / panel regression
开创性文献Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., Demirer, M., Duflo, E., Hansen, C., Newey, W., & Robins, J. (2018). Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters. The Econometrics Journal, 21(1), C1-C68. DOI ↗Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion. Princeton University Press. ISBN: 978-0691120355
别名ML-DR, AIPW with ML, Double/Debiased ML doubly robust, DML-DRdiff-in-diff, DiD, Farkların Farkı (Diff-in-Diff)
相关65
摘要Machine learning-augmented doubly robust (ML-DR) estimation combines the classical doubly robust (AIPW) identification strategy with flexible machine learning models for the nuisance functions — the propensity score and the outcome regression. The result is a causal estimator that is consistent if either ML component is correctly specified, and that achieves valid, root-n inference even when the nuisance models are estimated with high-dimensional regularisation or nonparametric learners.Difference-in-Differences is a causal-inference method that estimates the effect of an intervention by comparing how a treatment group and a control group change over time. Made famous by Card and Krueger's 1994 minimum-wage study and developed in Angrist and Pischke's Mostly Harmless Econometrics, it isolates the treatment effect as the difference between the two groups' before-after changes.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Machine learning-augmented doubly robust estimation · Difference-in-Differences. 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare