ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

机器学习增强的粗糙精确匹配 (ML-CEM)×双重稳健估计(AIPW)×
领域因果推断因果推断
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份2012-20192005
提出者Extension of Iacus, King & Porro (2012) CEM; ML integration developed in subsequent causal ML literatureRobins & Rotnitzky; Bang & Robins
类型Matching / quasi-experimentalSemiparametric causal estimator
开创性文献Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗Robins, J. M. & Rotnitzky, A. (1995). Semiparametric Efficiency in Multivariate Regression Models with Missing Data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90(429), 122-129. DOI ↗
别名ML-augmented CEM, ML-CEM, automated coarsened exact matching, ML-assisted CEMAIPW, augmented inverse probability weighting, doubly robust estimator, Çift Gürbüz Kestirici (Augmented IPW / AIPW)
相关65
摘要Machine Learning-Augmented Coarsened Exact Matching extends Coarsened Exact Matching (Iacus, King & Porro, 2012) by using supervised machine learning to automate and optimise the coarsening step — the discretisation of continuous covariates into bins — rather than relying on researcher-specified cutpoints. This reduces both ad hoc subjectivity in coarsening decisions and residual imbalance, while preserving CEM's core logic of exact matching within coarsened strata.Doubly Robust Estimation, also called Augmented Inverse Probability Weighting (AIPW), is a semiparametric method for estimating causal treatment effects that combines an outcome regression model with a propensity (treatment) model. Developed in the work of Robins & Rotnitzky (1995) and Bang & Robins (2005), it stays consistent as long as at least one of the two models is correctly specified.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Machine Learning-Augmented Coarsened Exact Matching · Doubly Robust Estimation. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare