ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

机器学习增强因果效应分析×面板事件研究×
领域因果推断因果推断
方法族Regression modelRegression model
起源年份2015-20181990s–2020s (modern panel formulation)
提出者Brodersen et al. (foundational BSTS framework, 2015); Chernozhukov et al. (double ML augmentation, 2018)Formalized by Freyaldenhoven, Hansen, Perez-Orive & Shapiro (2021); widely applied in finance (Fama et al. 1969) and policy evaluation
类型Quasi-experimental causal inference with MLQuasi-experimental / causal panel design
开创性文献Brodersen, K. H., Gallusser, F., Koehler, J., Remy, N., & Scott, S. L. (2015). Inferring causal impact using Bayesian structural time-series models. Annals of Applied Statistics, 9(1), 247-274. DOI ↗Freyaldenhoven, S., Hansen, C., Perez-Orive, J., & Shapiro, J. M. (2021). Visualization, Identification, and Estimation in the Linear Panel Event-Study Design. NBER Working Paper 29170. National Bureau of Economic Research. link ↗
别名ML-augmented causal impact, ML-CausalImpact, machine learning causal impact, ML-augmented BSTSevent-study regression, dynamic DiD, relative-time regression, distributed-lag panel model
相关64
摘要Machine learning-augmented causal impact analysis combines quasi-experimental counterfactual reasoning with flexible ML prediction models to estimate the causal effect of an intervention on a time series outcome. Building on Brodersen et al.'s Bayesian structural time series (BSTS) framework and extended by double/debiased ML methods, it constructs a synthetic counterfactual from donor covariates and infers the treatment effect as the gap between observed and predicted post-intervention outcomes.A panel event study estimates the dynamic causal effect of a treatment or policy by regressing an outcome on a full set of relative-time indicators — one for each period before and after the event — while controlling for unit and time fixed effects. The resulting coefficient plot shows how the treated units diverged from untreated units at each point in calendar time relative to their treatment date, making both pre-treatment trend violations and post-treatment effect trajectories immediately visible.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Machine learning-augmented causal impact analysis · Panel Event Study. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare