ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

LPF-CRITIC-EDAS×基于平均解的评估×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份1995 crisp; 2023 variant applicator2015
提出者Akram, M., Ramzan, N., Deveci, M.Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Olfat, L., Turskis, Z.
类型Linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy ranking — LPFN (I_ψ, I_ζ) with ψ²+ζ² ≤ τ²Distance from average solution
开创性文献Akram, M., Ramzan, N., Deveci, M. (2023). Linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy CRITIC-EDAS method for multiple-attribute group decision analysis. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence DOI ↗Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Olfat, L., Turskis, Z. (2015). Multi-criteria inventory classification using a new method of evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS). Informatica DOI ↗
别名
相关18
摘要LPF-EDAS (LPF-CRITIC-EDAS — Linguistic Pythagorean Fuzzy EDAS with CRITIC weighting (Akram-Ramzan-Deveci 2023)) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Akram, M., Ramzan, N., Deveci, M. in 1995 crisp; 2023 variant applicator. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.EDAS (Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Olfat, L., Turskis, Z. in 2015. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: LPF-EDAS · EDAS. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare