ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

纵向 nomological 效度×纵向测量不变性检验×
领域心理测量学心理测量学
方法族Latent structureLatent structure
起源年份1955 (concept); longitudinal extension 1990s–2000s1993
提出者Cronbach & Meehl (nomological network concept, 1955); longitudinal extension developed in organizational and personality research from the 1990s onwardWilliam Meredith
类型Validity evaluationMeasurement model testing
开创性文献Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58(4), 525–543. DOI ↗
别名longitudinal construct validity, nomological network validation across time, longitudinal criterion-related validity, temporal nomological validityLMI, longitudinal invariance, measurement equivalence across time, temporal measurement invariance
相关63
摘要Longitudinal nomological validity evaluates whether a construct's theoretically predicted relationships with other constructs hold consistently across multiple measurement occasions. It extends the nomological network framework of Cronbach and Meehl (1955) to longitudinal designs, testing whether a scale behaves as theory demands not only at a single time point but over time.Longitudinal measurement invariance testing determines whether a psychological scale measures the same construct in the same way across two or more time points. It is a prerequisite for interpreting mean-level change scores in panel and repeated-measures studies, ensuring that observed change reflects true change in the construct rather than drift in the measurement instrument.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Longitudinal Nomological Validity · Longitudinal Measurement Invariance. 于 2026-06-19 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare