ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

纵向 nomological 效度×判别效度×
领域心理测量学心理测量学
方法族Latent structureLatent structure
起源年份1955 (concept); longitudinal extension 1990s–2000s1959
提出者Cronbach & Meehl (nomological network concept, 1955); longitudinal extension developed in organizational and personality research from the 1990s onwardDonald T. Campbell and Donald W. Fiske
类型Validity evaluationValidity evidence / psychometric evaluation
开创性文献Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. DOI ↗Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗
别名longitudinal construct validity, nomological network validation across time, longitudinal criterion-related validity, temporal nomological validitydiscriminant validity evidence, divergent validity, DV, AVE-based discriminant validity
相关65
摘要Longitudinal nomological validity evaluates whether a construct's theoretically predicted relationships with other constructs hold consistently across multiple measurement occasions. It extends the nomological network framework of Cronbach and Meehl (1955) to longitudinal designs, testing whether a scale behaves as theory demands not only at a single time point but over time.Discriminant validity is evidence that a latent construct is empirically distinct from other constructs it should differ from. Originating in Campbell and Fiske's multitrait-multimethod framework (1959), it is a core component of construct validity and a mandatory check in scale development and structural equation modeling.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Longitudinal Nomological Validity · Discriminant Validity. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare