方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 纵向隐喻分析× | 话语分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 质性 | 质性研究 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2000s–2010s (systematic longitudinal application) | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| 提出者≠ | Lynne Cameron and colleagues (discourse dynamics framework); broader tradition rooted in Lakoff & Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory (1980) | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative analytic method | Method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Cameron, L., & Maslen, R. (Eds.). (2010). Metaphor Analysis: Research Practice in Applied Linguistics, Social Sciences and the Humanities. Equinox. ISBN: 978-1845531140 | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| 别名≠ | LMA, diachronic metaphor analysis, longitudinal conceptual metaphor study, repeated-measures metaphor analysis | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 2 |
| 摘要≠ | Longitudinal Metaphor Analysis (LMA) is a qualitative method that tracks how individuals or groups use metaphors across multiple time points to reveal conceptual, attitudinal, or identity shifts. Grounded in conceptual metaphor theory and discourse dynamics, it treats metaphor not as mere rhetorical decoration but as a window into evolving thought, belief, and meaning-making over time. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|