方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 纵向隐喻分析× | 内容分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 质性 | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2000s–2010s (systematic longitudinal application) | Systematised through Krippendorff's methodology work; 4th edition 2018 |
| 提出者≠ | Lynne Cameron and colleagues (discourse dynamics framework); broader tradition rooted in Lakoff & Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory (1980) | Klaus Krippendorff (systematic formulation); roots in early 20th-century communications research |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative analytic method | Qualitative / mixed-method research technique |
| 开创性文献≠ | Cameron, L., & Maslen, R. (Eds.). (2010). Metaphor Analysis: Research Practice in Applied Linguistics, Social Sciences and the Humanities. Equinox. ISBN: 978-1845531140 | Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506395661 |
| 别名≠ | LMA, diachronic metaphor analysis, longitudinal conceptual metaphor study, repeated-measures metaphor analysis | İçerik Analizi, systematic content coding, quantitative content analysis |
| 相关 | 5 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | Longitudinal Metaphor Analysis (LMA) is a qualitative method that tracks how individuals or groups use metaphors across multiple time points to reveal conceptual, attitudinal, or identity shifts. Grounded in conceptual metaphor theory and discourse dynamics, it treats metaphor not as mere rhetorical decoration but as a window into evolving thought, belief, and meaning-making over time. | Content analysis is a systematic research technique for reducing text, visual, or media material into coded categories so that patterns can be counted, compared, and interpreted. Formalised by Klaus Krippendorff in his widely cited methodology textbook (latest edition 2018), the method sits at the boundary of qualitative and quantitative inquiry: it imposes structured, replicable coding on inherently meaning-laden material. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|