方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 纵向扎根理论× | 建构主义扎根理论× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 质性 | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1990s–2000s (as a recognized variant of grounded theory) | 2000s (Charmaz 2000–2006; classic GT roots 1967) |
| 提出者≠ | Kathy Charmaz and longitudinal qualitative researchers (building on Glaser & Strauss) | Kathy Charmaz (building on Glaser & Strauss, 1967) |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative longitudinal research design | Qualitative research method |
| 开创性文献 | Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973522 | Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973539 |
| 别名 | LGT, longitudinal GT, temporal grounded theory, grounded theory longitudinal design | CGT, constructivist GT, Charmaz grounded theory, interpretive grounded theory |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Longitudinal grounded theory is a qualitative research design that applies grounded theory's inductive, iterative logic to data collected from the same participants or settings across multiple time points. It is used to build substantive theory that accounts not only for social processes but also for how those processes unfold, shift, and are renegotiated over time. The approach is particularly suited to studying change, trajectory, and temporal experience in social and health research. | Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT) is a qualitative methodology developed by Kathy Charmaz that systematically builds mid-range theory from empirical data through iterative coding, memo-writing, and theoretical sampling. Unlike the original objectivist version by Glaser and Strauss, CGT treats both data and theory as co-constructed between researcher and participants, acknowledging the researcher's interpretive perspective as an integral part of the analytic process rather than a source of bias to be eliminated. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|