方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 纵向扎根理论× | 经典扎根理论× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 质性 | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1990s–2000s (as a recognized variant of grounded theory) | 1967 |
| 提出者≠ | Kathy Charmaz and longitudinal qualitative researchers (building on Glaser & Strauss) | Barney G. Glaser and Anselm L. Strauss |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative longitudinal research design | Qualitative research method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973522 | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine. link ↗ |
| 别名 | LGT, longitudinal GT, temporal grounded theory, grounded theory longitudinal design | Glaserian GT, CGT, original grounded theory, classic GT |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Longitudinal grounded theory is a qualitative research design that applies grounded theory's inductive, iterative logic to data collected from the same participants or settings across multiple time points. It is used to build substantive theory that accounts not only for social processes but also for how those processes unfold, shift, and are renegotiated over time. The approach is particularly suited to studying change, trajectory, and temporal experience in social and health research. | Classic Grounded Theory (CGT) is a systematic qualitative methodology for generating substantive theory from empirical data. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, it uses iterative cycles of data collection, constant comparison, and memo writing to produce a core category and surrounding conceptual framework that explains a social or psychological process. Unlike its later variants, Glaserian CGT insists on emergence — theory must arise from data without forcing preconceived frameworks. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|