ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

纵向判别效度×聚合效度×
领域心理测量学心理测量学
方法族Latent structureLatent structure
起源年份1993–20001959
提出者Formalized through SEM-based validity traditions (Campbell & Fiske, 1959; Cole & Maxwell, 1993)Donald T. Campbell & Donald W. Fiske
类型Validity assessment / measurement qualityValidity evidence / construct validation
开创性文献Cole, D. A. & Maxwell, S. E. (1993). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(4), 558–577. DOI ↗Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗
别名LDV, longitudinal construct distinctiveness, cross-time discriminant validity, temporal discriminant validityconvergent construct validity, convergence validity, AVE-based convergent validity
相关44
摘要Longitudinal discriminant validity tests whether a psychological construct measured at two or more time points is empirically distinct across occasions — ensuring that the same construct does not collapse into a single undifferentiated mass over time. It is a prerequisite for meaningful change modeling in panel and longitudinal research.Convergent validity is the degree to which multiple indicators that are theoretically expected to measure the same construct actually correlate with one another. It is one of the two complementary forms of construct validity identified by Campbell and Fiske (1959) and is now routinely assessed via factor loadings and the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) statistic in SEM-based scale validation.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Longitudinal Discriminant Validity · Convergent Validity. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare