方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 纵向话语分析× | 批判性话语分析 (CDA)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 质性 | 质性 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1990s–2000s (systematised as a distinct approach) | Late 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995) |
| 提出者≠ | Norman Fairclough; Jan Blommaert; applied linguists in sociolinguistics and CDA traditions | Norman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth Wodak |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative longitudinal research design | Qualitative research method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. Routledge. ISBN: 978-0415258937 | Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press. link ↗ |
| 别名 | LDA, diachronic discourse analysis, longitudinal CDA, discourse change analysis | CDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational Analysis |
| 相关 | 6 | 6 |
| 摘要≠ | Longitudinal Discourse Analysis (LDA) is a qualitative research approach that examines how discourse — language in use, texts, talk, and representational practices — changes across time. Rather than analysing a single snapshot of language, LDA collects and compares discourse data at multiple points to uncover how meanings, identities, ideologies, or social practices evolve, stabilise, or shift under the influence of historical, institutional, or societal forces. | Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|