ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

纵向聚合效度×纵向判别效度×
领域心理测量学心理测量学
方法族Latent structureLatent structure
起源年份1997–20031993–2000
提出者Cole & Maxwell; Widaman & ReiseFormalized through SEM-based validity traditions (Campbell & Fiske, 1959; Cole & Maxwell, 1993)
类型Validity evidence frameworkValidity assessment / measurement quality
开创性文献Cole, D. A. & Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(4), 558–577. DOI ↗Cole, D. A. & Maxwell, S. E. (1993). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(4), 558–577. DOI ↗
别名longitudinal construct validity, repeated-measure convergent validity, cross-time convergent validity, temporal convergent validityLDV, longitudinal construct distinctiveness, cross-time discriminant validity, temporal discriminant validity
相关64
摘要Longitudinal convergent validity evaluates whether a scale's indicators correlate with theoretically related constructs not just at a single time point but consistently across repeated measurement occasions. It extends standard convergent validity testing into longitudinal designs to ensure that the scale measures the intended construct in the same meaningful way over time.Longitudinal discriminant validity tests whether a psychological construct measured at two or more time points is empirically distinct across occasions — ensuring that the same construct does not collapse into a single undifferentiated mass over time. It is a prerequisite for meaningful change modeling in panel and longitudinal research.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Longitudinal convergent validity · Longitudinal Discriminant Validity. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare