方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 纵向内容分析× | 话语分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域≠ | 质性 | 质性研究 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | Mid-20th century onward; systematized alongside content analysis (Berelson, 1952; Krippendorff, 1980) | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| 提出者≠ | Developed within the content analysis tradition; longitudinal extensions widely applied since the mid-20th century in communication and political science research | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| 类型≠ | Qualitative and mixed-methods research design | Method |
| 开创性文献≠ | Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (4th ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1506395661 | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| 别名≠ | LCA, repeated content analysis, diachronic content analysis, trend content analysis | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 2 |
| 摘要≠ | Longitudinal Content Analysis (LCA) applies systematic content analysis to documents, media, or texts sampled at two or more time points in order to detect how themes, frames, language, or discourse patterns change or persist over time. Drawing on the established logic of content analysis, it adds a temporal dimension that allows researchers to chart trends, trace the evolution of representations, and test hypotheses about historical or social change. It is widely used in communication research, political science, media studies, and the health sciences. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|