ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

纵向结构效度×重测信度×
领域心理测量学心理测量学
方法族Latent structureLatent structure
起源年份1993–20001904
提出者Meredith, Vandenberg, and the measurement invariance traditionKarl Pearson
类型Validity evaluation frameworkReliability estimate
开创性文献Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗Nunnally, J. C. & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric Theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 978-0070478497
别名longitudinal measurement validity, construct validity over time, longitudinal measurement invariance, LCVstability reliability, temporal stability, repeatability coefficient, TRT reliability
相关54
摘要Longitudinal construct validity evaluates whether a psychological scale measures the same latent construct in the same way across multiple time points. It is tested by progressively constraining a confirmatory factor model across waves and comparing model fit, ensuring that observed change scores reflect genuine change in the underlying trait rather than measurement drift.Test-retest reliability quantifies the temporal consistency of a measure by correlating scores obtained from the same participants on two separate occasions. It is a cornerstone of psychometric validation, directly indicating whether a scale or instrument yields stable scores when the underlying construct has not changed.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Longitudinal Construct Validity · Test-Retest Reliability. 于 2026-06-15 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare