方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 纵向结构效度× | 聚合效度× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 心理测量学 | 心理测量学 |
| 方法族 | Latent structure | Latent structure |
| 起源年份≠ | 1993–2000 | 1959 |
| 提出者≠ | Meredith, Vandenberg, and the measurement invariance tradition | Donald T. Campbell & Donald W. Fiske |
| 类型≠ | Validity evaluation framework | Validity evidence / construct validation |
| 开创性文献≠ | Vandenberg, R. J. & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. DOI ↗ | Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. DOI ↗ |
| 别名≠ | longitudinal measurement validity, construct validity over time, longitudinal measurement invariance, LCV | convergent construct validity, convergence validity, AVE-based convergent validity |
| 相关≠ | 5 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | Longitudinal construct validity evaluates whether a psychological scale measures the same latent construct in the same way across multiple time points. It is tested by progressively constraining a confirmatory factor model across waves and comparing model fit, ensuring that observed change scores reflect genuine change in the underlying trait rather than measurement drift. | Convergent validity is the degree to which multiple indicators that are theoretically expected to measure the same construct actually correlate with one another. It is one of the two complementary forms of construct validity identified by Campbell and Fiske (1959) and is now routinely assessed via factor loadings and the Average Variance Extracted (AVE) statistic in SEM-based scale validation. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|