方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| Logic Model× | Evidence-Based Practice Process× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | Social Work | Social Work |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2004 | 1996 |
| 提出者≠ | Program-evaluation tradition; popularized by the W. K. Kellogg Foundation | Evidence-based medicine tradition (Sackett et al.); translated to social work by Gambrill and others |
| 类型≠ | Diagram linking program resources and activities to intended outcomes | Structured process for integrating evidence, expertise, and client values in practice decisions |
| 开创性文献≠ | W. K. Kellogg Foundation. (2004). Logic Model Development Guide. W. K. Kellogg Foundation. link ↗ | Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M. C., Gray, J. A. M., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. BMJ, 312(7023), 71–72. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | Program Logic Model, Logical Framework, Program Theory Model, Logic Model (Social Work) | EBP Process, Evidence-Based Practice (Process Model), Five-Step EBP Process, Evidence-Informed Practice Process |
| 相关 | 4 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | A logic model is a diagram that lays out the intended logic of a program — how its resources and activities are expected to produce outputs and, through them, short-, intermediate-, and long-term outcomes. Popularized in human services by the W. K. Kellogg Foundation's development guide, it makes a program's underlying theory of change explicit and testable, providing the backbone for program planning, communication with stakeholders, and evaluation by clarifying exactly what the program does and what it is supposed to achieve. | The evidence-based practice (EBP) process is a structured, five-step way of making practice decisions by integrating the best available research evidence with professional expertise and the client's values and circumstances. Originating in evidence-based medicine as defined by Sackett and colleagues and translated into social work by Eileen Gambrill and others, it reframes EBP not as a fixed list of approved programs but as a transparent decision process — ask, acquire, appraise, apply, assess — that an individual practitioner carries out with and for a particular client. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|