ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Logical Framework Approach×Stakeholder Analysis for Development×
领域Development StudiesDevelopment Studies
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19691997
提出者Leon Rosenberg / Practical Concepts Inc. for USAID; later NORAD, GTZ, European CommissionRobin Grimble & Kate Wellard; Mark Reed and colleagues
类型Project planning, monitoring and evaluation frameworkAnalytical method for identifying and characterising actors
开创性文献NORAD (1999). The Logical Framework Approach (LFA): Handbook for Objectives-Oriented Planning (4th ed.). Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation, Oslo. link ↗Reed, M. S., Graves, A., Dandy, N., Posthumus, H., Hubacek, K., Morris, J., Prell, C., Quinn, C. H., & Stringer, L. C. (2009). Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1933-1949. DOI ↗
别名Logframe, LFA, Logical Framework Matrix, Objectives-Oriented PlanningStakeholder mapping, Power-interest analysis, Actor analysis, Influence-importance matrix
相关44
摘要The Logical Framework Approach (Logframe) is a structured planning, monitoring, and evaluation method that distils an intervention into a single four-by-four matrix linking a hierarchy of objectives to the indicators, evidence, and external conditions on which success depends. Originated by Leon Rosenberg of Practical Concepts Incorporated for USAID in 1969 and elaborated by agencies such as GTZ, NORAD, and the European Commission, it forces planners to make explicit the causal logic by which activities are expected to produce outputs, outcomes, and ultimately a development goal.Stakeholder analysis in development is a structured method for identifying the actors with a stake in an intervention and characterising their interests, power, and influence, so that programmes can be designed and implemented with a clear view of whom they affect and who can affect them. Drawing on the natural-resource-management tradition of Robin Grimble and Kate Wellard and the methodological typology of Mark Reed and colleagues, it employs tools such as the power-interest grid, the influence-importance matrix, and Venn diagrams to make the social landscape of a project explicit.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Logical Framework Approach · Stakeholder Analysis for Development. 于 2026-06-24 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare