ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

封锁幸福感量表×COVID-19心理健康影响量表×
领域公共卫生公共卫生
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份20212020
提出者Giuntella et al.Wang et al.
类型Self-reportSelf-report
开创性文献Giuntella, O., Hyde, K., Saccardo, S., & Solomon, S. (2021). Lifestyle and mental health disruptions during COVID-19. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(9), e2016632118. DOI ↗Wang, C., Pan, R., Wan, X., Tan, Y., Xu, L., Ho, C. S., & Ho, R. C. (2020). Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic among the general population in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), 1729. DOI ↗
别名LWS, Restrictions Wellbeing ScaleCMHIS
相关33
摘要The Lockdown Wellbeing Scale (LWS) measures the specific psychological and social impacts of mobility restrictions and lockdown policies on individual well-being. Developed by Giuntella and colleagues from economic and social data on pandemic restrictions, it captures dimensions of isolation, social disconnection, routinization disruption, and perceived loss of autonomy. The LWS is distinct from anxiety/depression measures, focusing instead on how restrictive policies themselves affect quality of life and social well-being.The COVID-19 Mental Health Impact Scale (CMHIS) is a brief, multidimensional instrument assessing anxiety, depression, and stress symptoms triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic. Developed by Wang and colleagues in 2020 during the initial pandemic wave in China, it captures the spectrum of psychological distress across multiple symptom domains. The CMHIS has been widely adopted in pandemic surveillance and mental health research across 30+ countries, providing rapid assessment of population mental health burden.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Lockdown Wellbeing Scale · COVID-19 Mental Health Impact Scale. 于 2026-06-20 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare