方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 线性最大值归一化× | 复杂比例评估× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 决策 | 决策 |
| 方法族 | MCDM | MCDM |
| 起源年份≠ | 1967 | 1996 |
| 提出者≠ | Fishburn, P. C. | Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. |
| 类型≠ | Normalization (linear-max, ratio-based) | Proportional assessment (benefit/cost split) |
| 开创性文献≠ | Fishburn, P. C. (1967). Additive Utilities with Incomplete Product Sets: Application to Priorities and Assignments. Operations Research DOI ↗ | Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. (1996). Determination of an Efficient Contractor by Using the New Method of Multicriteria Assessment. International Symposium for The Organization and Management of Construction. Shaping Theory and Practice. Vol. 2: Managing the Construction Project and Managing Risk. CIB W 65 link ↗ |
| 别名 | — | — |
| 相关≠ | 4 | 8 |
| 摘要≠ | LINEAR-MAX-NORMALIZATION (Linear Max Normalization — division by column maximum (benefit) or column minimum over value (cost)) is a normalization multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Fishburn, P. C. in 1967. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. | COPRAS (Complex Proportional Assessment) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Zavadskas, E. K., Kaklauskas, A. in 1996. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|