ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

词汇丰富度×词频分析×
领域文本挖掘文本挖掘
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份1949
提出者George K. Zipf (frequency-distribution foundation)
类型Text quantification / lexical richness measurementDescriptive text-mining analysis
开创性文献McCarthy, P. M. & Jarvis, S. (2010). MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment. Behavior Research Methods, 42(2), 381-392. DOI ↗Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human Behavior and the Principle of Least Effort. Addison-Wesley. link ↗
别名lexical richness, vocabulary richness, Sözcüksel Çeşitlilik Analiziword frequency analysis, n-gram frequency analysis, Metin Frekans Analizi
相关34
摘要Lexical diversity analysis quantifies how varied the vocabulary of a text is — how rich an author's word choice is — using measures such as the type-token ratio (TTR), MTLD, vocd-D, and Yule's K. The MTLD and vocd-D measures were validated by McCarthy and Jarvis (2010), building on earlier work by Tweedie and Baayen (1998) on the stability of lexical-richness measures.Text frequency analysis is a descriptive text-mining method that counts how often words, n-grams, and phrases occur in a corpus to reveal content patterns and dominant themes. It rests on the frequency-distribution insight formalised by George K. Zipf (1949), that a few terms occur very often while most are rare, and it is one of the most basic and widely used entry points into quantitative text analysis.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Lexical Diversity · Text Frequency Analysis. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare