ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

2-元语言中性模糊EDAS×准则重要性通过准则间相关性 (CRITIC)×
领域决策决策
方法族MCDMMCDM
起源年份20191995
提出者Wang, P., Wang, J., Wei, G.Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L.
类型Linguistic outranking/ranking — 2-Tuple Linguistic Variable (2TL: (s_i, α))Statistical contrast intensity + correlation-based objective weighting
开创性文献Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Olfat, L., & Turskis, Z. (2015). Multi-criteria inventory classification using a new method of evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS). Informatica, 26(3), 435-451. [Canonical EDAS source; cited in place of the retracted Wang et al. (2019) 2-tuple linguistic neutrosophic EDAS paper, doi:10.3233/JIFS-179223.] DOI ↗Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research DOI ↗
别名
相关88
摘要L2T-EDAS (2-Tuple Linguistic Neutrosophic EDAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Wang, P., Wang, J., Wei, G. in 2019. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CRITIC (CRiteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., Papayannakis, L. in 1995. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: L2T-EDAS · CRITIC. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare