ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Known-Item Search Success×Query Log Analysis×
领域Library Information ScienceLibrary Information Science
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19682000
提出者William S. Cooper (expected search length); IR evaluation traditionBernard J. Jansen, Amanda Spink & Tefko Saracevic; Silverstein et al.
类型Evaluation pipeline for single-target (known-item) retrievalTransaction-log analysis pipeline for search behavior
开创性文献Cooper, W. S. (1968). Expected search length: A single measure of retrieval effectiveness based on the weak ordering action of retrieval systems. American Documentation, 19(1), 30-41. DOI ↗Jansen, B. J., Spink, A., & Saracevic, T. (2000). Real life, real users, and real needs: a study and analysis of user queries on the web. Information Processing & Management, 36(2), 207-227. DOI ↗
别名Known-Item Retrieval Evaluation, Target Document Search Evaluation, Reciprocal Rank Evaluation, Known-Item Finding SuccessTransaction Log Analysis, Search Log Analysis, Web Query Log Analysis, Query Transaction Analysis
相关33
摘要Known-item search is the case where the user is looking for one specific document they already know exists — a particular paper, book, web page, or record — rather than exploring a topic. Evaluation is correspondingly specialized: with exactly one correct answer per query, the question is simply how high the system ranks that single target. The natural measures are reciprocal rank (and its mean, MRR), success-at-k, and Cooper's expected search length, which counts how many wrong documents the user must wade through before reaching the right one. These metrics, averaged over many known-item topics, give a clean, interpretable picture of how well a system supports re-finding a specific document.Query log analysis — also called transaction-log analysis — studies the records that search systems automatically keep of what users typed, what they clicked, and when. Rather than asking users what they do or testing systems in the laboratory, it observes millions of real searches as they actually happened. The landmark studies by Jansen, Spink, and Saracevic on the Excite engine and by Silverstein and colleagues on AltaVista revealed a consistent and surprising picture: real web queries are very short, rarely use advanced operators, and users almost never look past the first page of results. By cleaning logs, reconstructing sessions, and tabulating term, query, and session statistics, the method turns raw server records into a behavioral portrait of how people really search.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Known-Item Search Success · Query Log Analysis. 于 2026-06-25 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare