方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| 知识转化× | 规范化过程理论 (NPT)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 实施科学 | 实施科学 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 2004 | 2006 |
| 提出者≠ | Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) | May, C. R. |
| 类型 | Framework | Framework |
| 开创性文献≠ | Canadian Institutes of Health Research. (2004). Knowledge Translation Strategy 2004-2009. CIHR, Ottawa. link ↗ | May, C. R. (2006). A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care. BMC Health Services Research, 6, 86. DOI ↗ |
| 别名 | KT, evidence-to-practice, research-to-practice | NPT, normalization theory, routinization |
| 相关 | 5 | 5 |
| 摘要≠ | Knowledge Translation (KT) is the systematic synthesis, dissemination, exchange, and application of research findings to improve health outcomes and healthcare practice. First formalized by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research in 2004, KT recognizes that evidence generation alone does not automatically change clinical or policy behaviour, and structures a purposeful process to bridge the gap between research and practice. | Normalization Process Theory (NPT) is a sociological framework developed by Carl May and colleagues to explain how new interventions become routinely embedded ('normalized') in organizational and clinical practice. Unlike efficiency-focused frameworks that measure adoption and fidelity, NPT explains the social processes through which interventions transition from external innovations to normal practice. NPT identifies four key mechanisms (Coherence, Cognitive Participation, Collective Action, Reflexive Monitoring) that collectively determine whether an intervention becomes 'the way we do things here' or remains a temporary project. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|