ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

k-核分解×社群检测×
领域网络分析网络分析
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19832002–2019 (algorithm family)
提出者Stephen B. SeidmanLouvain: Blondel et al. (2008); Leiden: Traag et al. (2019); Girvan-Newman: Girvan & Newman (2002); Infomap: Rosvall & Bergstrom (2008)
类型Graph pruning and hierarchical decompositionGraph-partitioning / clustering algorithm family
开创性文献Seidman, S. B. (1983). Network structure and minimum degree. Social Networks, 5(3), 269–287. DOI ↗Blondel, V.D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R. & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast Unfolding of Communities in Large Networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics, 2008(10), P10008. DOI ↗
别名Core Decomposition, Coreness Decomposition, Shell Decomposition, Çekirdek Ayrıştırmagraph clustering, network partitioning, Topluluk Tespiti (Louvain, Girvan-Newman, Leiden)
相关35
摘要k-Core Decomposition is a graph-theoretic method that partitions the vertices of a network into a nested sequence of subgraphs called k-cores. A k-core is the maximal subgraph in which every vertex has at least k neighbors within that subgraph. Introduced by Stephen B. Seidman in 1983, the method assigns each vertex a coreness number that captures its structural centrality relative to the local connectivity of the graph.Community detection is a family of graph-partitioning algorithms that discover densely connected sub-groups — communities — within a network. First formalised through the modularity measure by Girvan and Newman (2002), the field advanced rapidly with the Louvain method (Blondel et al., 2008), the Leiden refinement (Traag et al., 2019), and the information-theoretic Infomap approach. All variants answer the same question: which nodes cluster together more tightly among themselves than with the rest of the network?
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: k-Core Decomposition · Community Detection. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare