ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Journey to Crime Analysis×Routine Activity Theory×
领域CriminologyCriminology
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份20001979
提出者D. Kim Rossmo (geographic profiling); journey-to-crime traditionLawrence E. Cohen & Marcus Felson
类型Spatial analysis of offender travel and home-location inferenceTheoretical framework for explaining the occurrence of predatory crime
开创性文献Rossmo, D. K. (2000). Geographic Profiling. CRC Press. ISBN: 9780849381294Cohen, L. E., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44(4), 588–608. DOI ↗
别名Journey-to-Crime Modeling, Geographic Profiling, Crime Trip Analysis, Distance-Decay Crime AnalysisRAT, Routine Activities Approach, Crime Triangle Framework, Cohen-Felson Theory
相关44
摘要Journey-to-crime analysis studies how far and where offenders travel from an anchor point — usually home — to commit crimes, and inverts that pattern to infer an unknown offender's likely base. The aggregate distance-decay regularity (most crimes occur near the offender's home, with frequency falling off with distance) underlies geographic profiling, formalized by D. Kim Rossmo in 2000 to prioritize the search for serial offenders.Routine activity theory explains predatory crime not by the supply of motivated offenders but by the everyday structure of legal activities that brings offenders, targets, and the absence of guardians together in space and time. Proposed by Lawrence Cohen and Marcus Felson in 1979, it argues that crime rates can rise even when offender motivation is constant, because changes in how people work, shop, and spend leisure time alter the opportunities for crime.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Journey to Crime Analysis · Routine Activity Theory. 于 2026-06-25 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare