方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| Joanna Briggs Institute 批判性评价工具（系统评价）× | Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for Observational Study Quality Assessment× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 研究方法论 | 研究方法论 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1998 (updated 2017) | 2000 |
| 提出者≠ | Joanna Briggs Institute (University of Adelaide, Australia) | Wells et al. (Ottawa Hospital Research Institute) |
| 类型≠ | Research methodology evaluation | Research team assessment |
| 开创性文献≠ | Joanna Briggs Institute. (2017). Critical Appraisal Tools. University of Adelaide, South Australia. www.jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools link ↗ | Wells, G. A., Shea, B., O'Connell, D., Peterson, J., Welch, V., Losos, M., & Tugwell, P. (2000). The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Retrieved from Ottawa Hospital Research Institute. link ↗ |
| 别名≠ | JBI, Joanna Briggs | NOS |
| 相关≠ | 3 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute) Critical Appraisal Tools are a comprehensive suite of design-specific quality assessment instruments developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute (University of Adelaide, Australia) since 1998. Unlike single-tool approaches, JBI offers over 15 separate checklists tailored to RCTs, cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional surveys, qualitative research, diagnostic accuracy, and economic evaluations. JBI tools are widely used in systematic reviews, particularly in healthcare, nursing, and public health. | The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) is a widely used tool for assessing the methodological quality of observational studies (case-control and cohort designs) included in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Developed by Wells et al. at Ottawa Hospital in 2000, it provides explicit criteria and a star-based scoring system that enables transparent, quantitative comparison of study quality across evidence syntheses. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|