方法对比
并排查看您选择的方法；存在差异的行会高亮显示。
| Joanna Briggs Institute 批判性评价工具（系统评价）× | COSMIN：评估测量工具研究的方法学质量× | |
|---|---|---|
| 领域 | 研究方法论 | 研究方法论 |
| 方法族 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 起源年份≠ | 1998 (updated 2017) | 2010 |
| 提出者≠ | Joanna Briggs Institute (University of Adelaide, Australia) | Mokkink et al. (COSMIN Group) |
| 类型≠ | Research methodology evaluation | Measurement instrument evaluation |
| 开创性文献≠ | Joanna Briggs Institute. (2017). Critical Appraisal Tools. University of Adelaide, South Australia. www.jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools link ↗ | Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., ... & de Vet, H. C. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 19(4), 539–549. DOI ↗ |
| 别名≠ | JBI, Joanna Briggs | COSMIN |
| 相关≠ | 3 | 4 |
| 摘要≠ | JBI (Joanna Briggs Institute) Critical Appraisal Tools are a comprehensive suite of design-specific quality assessment instruments developed by the Joanna Briggs Institute (University of Adelaide, Australia) since 1998. Unlike single-tool approaches, JBI offers over 15 separate checklists tailored to RCTs, cohort studies, case-control studies, cross-sectional surveys, qualitative research, diagnostic accuracy, and economic evaluations. JBI tools are widely used in systematic reviews, particularly in healthcare, nursing, and public health. | COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) is a systematic framework and 10-item checklist developed by Mokkink et al. (2010) to evaluate the methodological quality of studies that assess the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), questionnaires, and clinical scales. COSMIN guides the development, validation, and selection of health measurement instruments across clinical research and practice. |
| ScholarGate数据集 ↗ |
|
|