ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

项目分析(经典测量理论)×测验等值×
领域心理测量学心理测量学
方法族Latent structureLatent structure
起源年份19791984 (modern statistical treatment)
提出者Classical Test Theory tradition; foundational texts by Allen & Yen (1979) and Crocker & Algina (1986)Kolen & Brennan (foundational treatise, 2004/2014); Holland & Dorans (2006)
类型Descriptive / psychometric screeningScore transformation / latent-scale calibration
开创性文献Allen, M. J. & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to Measurement Theory. Brooks/Cole. ISBN: 978-0818501333Kolen, M.J. & Brennan, R.L. (2014). Test Equating, Scaling, and Linking: Methods and Practices (3rd ed.). Springer. ISBN: 978-1-4939-0316-6
别名Madde Analizi (Klasik Test Kuramı), CTT item analysis, classical item analysisTest Eşitleme (Test Equating), score equating, equipercentile equating, IRT true-score equating
相关54
摘要Item analysis is the foundational psychometric procedure for evaluating the quality of individual test or scale items within the Classical Test Theory (CTT) framework, as systematised by Allen and Yen (1979) and Crocker and Algina (1986). It produces an item difficulty index, an item discrimination index, and a distractor analysis for each item, enabling test developers to identify items that are too easy, too hard, or failing to separate high- and low-ability respondents.Test equating is a family of statistical methods that converts scores earned on one test form onto the score scale of another form, so that scores from different administrations or versions can be compared and reported on a common metric. The foundational modern treatment is Kolen and Brennan (2004/2014); Holland and Dorans (2006) provide the authoritative chapter-length overview within the field of educational measurement.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Item Analysis · Test Equating. 于 2026-06-17 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare