ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

巴氏指数:缺血性卒中后功能结局评估×多发性硬化症功能复合量表×
领域神经病学神经病学
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19651999
提出者Florence I. Mahoney and Dorothea BarthelGary Cutter, Richard Rudick, and NMSS Consortium
类型Clinician or caregiver reportClinician-administered performance test
开创性文献Barthel, D. W., Gottwald, B. (1965). Functional Evaluation: The Barthel Index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 14(5), 61-65. DOI ↗Cutter, G. R., Baier, M. L., Rudick, R. A., et al. (1999). Development of a multiple sclerosis functional composite as a clinical trial outcome measure. Multiple Sclerosis, 5(4), 244-250. DOI ↗
别名Barthel Index, Modified Barthel IndexMS Functional Composite
相关44
摘要The Barthel Index (BI) is the most widely used functional assessment tool for measuring disability and dependency in activities of daily living, particularly in stroke and neurological rehabilitation. Developed by Florence Mahoney and Dorothea Barthel in 1965, the 10-item index quantifies independence in basic self-care and mobility tasks. The Barthel Index is the standard functional outcome measure in stroke trials, rehabilitation settings, and long-term follow-up cohorts, predicting discharge disposition and functional prognosis.The Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) is an objective, performance-based assessment of MS-related disability capturing three key functional domains: lower extremity mobility, upper extremity coordination, and cognitive/processing speed. Developed in 1999 by the National MS Society and adopted widely in clinical trials, the MSFC provides quantifiable endpoints complementing the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). The three-component design addresses EDSS limitations by including cognition and standardizing measurement via timed tasks.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: BI · MSFC. 于 2026-06-18 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare