ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Intertextuality Analysis×Scripture Stylometry×
领域Religious StudiesReligious Studies
方法族Process / pipelineMachine learning
起源年份19892002
提出者Richard B. Hays (echoes/allusion criteria); building on Julia Kristeva's intertextualityJohn Burrows (Delta); applied to scripture by Faigenbaum-Golovin et al. and others
类型Criteria-based pipeline for detecting and interpreting scriptural allusions and echoesDistance-based stylometric model over function-word frequencies
开创性文献Hays, R. B. (1989). Echoes of Scripture in the Letters of Paul. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN: 9780300044713Burrows, J. (2002). 'Delta': a Measure of Stylistic Difference and a Guide to Likely Authorship. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 17(3), 267-287. DOI ↗
别名Inner-Biblical Allusion Analysis, Echoes of Scripture, Allusion and Echo Criticism, Scriptural IntertextualityStylometric Analysis of Sacred Texts, Computational Stylistics of Scripture, Burrows's Delta for Scripture, Quantitative Stylistics of Religious Texts
相关44
摘要Intertextuality analysis studies how one text invokes another, and in biblical studies it focuses on the dense web of allusion and echo by which later scripture reuses earlier scripture. When Paul quotes, paraphrases, or faintly echoes Israel's scriptures, the borrowed words carry their old context into the new, enriching and sometimes reshaping the meaning. Richard B. Hays's 1989 Echoes of Scripture in the Letters of Paul made this study rigorous by proposing a set of criteria for deciding when an apparent echo is real and what it does. Drawing the term intertextuality from literary theory but giving it a controlled, text-critical application, Hays distinguished quotation, allusion, and the faintest echo, and showed how an evoked source text can transform a passage through the figure of metalepsis. The method gives disciplined criteria for a notoriously slippery interpretive judgment.Scripture stylometry measures the writing style of sacred texts quantitatively, chiefly through the frequencies of the most common words, in order to compare passages, detect authorial layers, and test traditional claims about who wrote what. Its workhorse is John Burrows's Delta, introduced in 2002, which represents each text as a profile of standardized function-word frequencies and measures the stylistic distance between texts as the average difference between those profiles. Because function words such as articles, prepositions, and particles are used unconsciously and at rates that vary little with subject matter, they form a stable stylistic fingerprint. Recent work, such as the 2025 word-frequency study of the Hebrew Bible by Faigenbaum-Golovin and colleagues, shows how these techniques distinguish scribal corpora and corroborate or challenge the layers identified by traditional source criticism.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 1 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Intertextuality Analysis · Scripture Stylometry. 于 2026-06-24 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare