ScholarGate
助手

方法对比

并排查看您选择的方法;存在差异的行会高亮显示。

Intersectionality Analysis×主题分析×
领域Gender Studies质性研究
方法族Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
起源年份19892006
提出者Kimberlé CrenshawVirginia Braun and Victoria Clarke
类型Critical qualitative analytic frameworkMethod
开创性文献Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. DOI ↗Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
别名Intersectional Analysis, Intersectionality Framework, Intersectional Qualitative AnalysisTA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis
相关43
摘要Intersectionality analysis is a critical qualitative framework that examines how multiple social categories — such as race, gender, class, sexuality, and disability — intersect and operate together to shape lived experience, advantage, and disadvantage. Coined by legal scholar Kimberlé Crenshaw in 1989 and 1991, it rejects single-axis analysis that treats categories one at a time, insisting instead that overlapping systems of power produce qualitatively distinct positions that cannot be understood by adding the categories separately.Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences.
ScholarGate数据集
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 来源
  3. PUBLISHED

前往搜索 下载幻灯片

ScholarGate方法对比: Intersectionality Analysis · Thematic Analysis. 于 2026-06-24 检索自 https://scholargate.app/zh/compare